Dear Mr. Steele

Sunday, October 11th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

Dear Mr. Steele

Michael Steel Chairman, Republican National CommitteeMr. Steele, acknowledge receipt of the form letter and 2009, where the Republican Party and the investigation will be practicing in my name, I use this opportunity to address the problems raised in their use in a deeper way than such a simple Multiple Choice survey permits. For your convenience, and I have my multiplication ask questions before giving my answers. Question: "The most recent national survey reported that nearly 25% of Americans want the government to adopt more socialist law. Do you agree or disagree? "No true American would respond that they meet the proposed action. Similarly, no student of history who clearly see the horrors of the past and present, that the Socialist government in all its many forms, the people would answer yes, if it so with a lust for power for themselves and control other blinded to suffer. This result confirms what I've observed time and again, and glad to be true that there are approximately one quarter of the U.S. population as a hard core left's desire for a "utopia" as she can remember, the hand of the Almighty, the government should be created . The problem is that I asked what did the Republican Party to stop the slowly creeping hand unconstitutional government control over the years? What has given them a better guardian of American freedom? Is it just the fact that they do not have to ask, were involved, so much worse than other legislation socialist political parties? If this is the case, and it's safe, it's not that I disagree with, but if the Republican Party agrees and is willing, against members who act to promote such nonsense. Q: How do you create more jobs for the American economy: government programs and spending, or the American Free Enterprise System? "The question should not, which creates more jobs, more freedom and lasting jobs. Both systems have been established with the creation of jobs. But it is a good policy for a man to dig a hole and then just complete renovation of it so that it can again be dug up so many projects to pay the government's job? Is it a good policy for buildings seen less and build easy to spend money the government wants? Is it a good policy to adopt legislation that is a job for a slain American workers, but creates bureaucratic monitor two locations to the other, that government policies often do not? Of course it is not. The American Free Enterprise System, of course, creates jobs, and that by allowing people to freely enter into contracts with another for goods and services. It allows them to take advantage of their freedom, and is evident and clearly a better system in spite of times, freedom, pain and suffering of poor people who are business decisions. Of course, I prefer the latter to the inevitable pain treated by government bureaucrats. Question: "The Obama administration has proposed spending as much as $ 1 5 trillion to rescue the banking sector. Do you agree or disagree with this proposal? "It's not just Obama administration, which has proposed such. It was also the Republican Party representatives who have done, how, and actually helped the rescue efforts of lenders, it was poor economic decisions with their investments and bad in its fiduciary responsibility to their customers, which they have invested. Tarp is a striking example of this. Of course, such measures are extra-constitutional scope and should not be performed. The problem has shown that none of the major parties have the opportunity to lead such a theme has. Q: Do you think that their so-called "card check" legislation, which is prevented by secret ballot in union elections devices and provides the employees at risk of threats of job managers? "Ways votes of minor importance in this matter. In the foreground is the harassment of those practices, but in others who would try that against his will. Of course, secret ballots are good and I think that in the majority, how often they are preferred. But they are not always necessary. Declaration of Independence was not a secret ballot, for example, and all those in favor of proudly and openly showed his voice over the signature. The problem with unionization is deeper than the issue of "card", which I am sure the control must be fought. Many industries and businesses were forced to accept unions, simply on the willingness of employees that unions are based. This is private property of its owner if he or she will not accept such an act, even with such an entity. Notify the contractor must, just as those who wanted to trade union, and I am afraid that this is often not the case because of the strength and bargaining power of many unions that have been shown to paralyze the activities if they are too big and powerful are protected and ensured at the expense of adequate business practices. Question: Should Republicans unite for a new federal government bureaucracy that economic growth crush blocked? The Republican party should unite to block a new federal government, the bureaucracy of the unconstitutional nature. The assumption that the general principle would be much admired. The question is, will the GOP? Question: "Should Republicans in Congress were against the new government wasteful spending program in the latest" stimulus "Bill of Pelosi-Reid Democrats designs to" spread the wealth? "See previous answer about unconstitutional government. The hypothesis that the highest principle of the Republican Party to serve, and also answers to many questions you ask me. Question: Is "you agree that we must secure our borders and stop illegal immigration?" If you think there is immigration control is a legitimate role for government and the Constitution clearly states that such a role, and given that it is legitimate and not – are discriminatory laws that allow certain types of illegal immigration is the answer to that question should be clear. The answer is yes. But the Republican Party has limited effect in this endeavor with senior members of the party and push the notion of amnesty for current offenders through tough law enforcement and legitimate rule of law. Question: "Are we going to do everything we can for Democrats seeking to turn conservative radio program with the so-called fairness doctrine? "The issue of government control over media and radio block centers goes far beyond the attempts of some to extend the mandate of the methods and standards for private companies through the" Fairness Doctrine "or some other such ugly thing in an attempt to disseminate ideas and opinions that the government and those responsible for it can not regulate how. Distinguished members of the federal government must thuggish against such acts is obvious. But the problem is that the government too far down a treacherous path through the system of units which radio stations to be misleading information about their rights to "public" airwaves under the guise that they are "public" and only to regulate on the basis of this assumption. On the other hand there is no difference between the so-called "public" airwaves will be used by radio stations and two citizens of the message at the street corner. Both words travel through the air, and when you will then be regulated, and the others can. Of course, should not be less than the requirement of freedom of expression. The regulation of "public" airwaves is a dangerous path that only a further violation of the First Amendment to the command of officers unfriendly to liberty and their actions should be seriously considered and returned only constitutional roles are clearly defined in the federal Constitution paired. Sorry for the federal government that would be for them a reduction of red tape they have for this purpose over the years creating a complete, since there is no constitutional authority for such. Question: "Are we going to resist proposals from Barak Obama to the Association of Taxpayers' spend billions of dollars to" volunteer "work of his choice? Pay "The federal government should not be a single isolated fraction of one percent of taxpayers' money, they pay, in addition to the powers granted to them by the Constitution. Question: If the Republicans put themselves in opposition to judicial candidates, who had a personal agenda for social issues left for his work as a judge? "The advice and consent role in the Senate in the nomination has always been to prevent the President from appointing unqualified jurists on the bench completely, whether for personal relatives, political cronies or people who are not faithful to the principles of the United States and our Constitution. The integrity of the judiciary had been tainted with high impact in the past, but since that time. If a judge is appointed is unwilling to prevent the taking of life without due process of law (except for injury prevention) and to defend the conviction of a person convicted of an offense punishable by a Constitution with a qualified opinion that the fate of death would be completely disqualified and vice versa. If the judge this nomination is not possible to read clearly and are not prepared to second amendment is ready for people's right to keep and bear arms to all applicable before them correctly, they should be from rising to an arbitrary position on the federal bench, ruled . Question: "Will Republicans strongly support the recent Partial-Birth Abortion Ban attacks from the Democratic majority? Defense: "I rather expect that the Republicans vigorously the right to life of all people, including the unborn, which satisfies all the biological and defend the ethical standard of human life, which proclaimed that we are all on our own declaration of independence and our Constitution authorized. Question: "Would the bureaucrats in Washington, DC, in charge of your health decisions instead of you and your doctor?" Such a question should not even be necessary. The Republican party will resist unconstitutional power, of course, would be such a control from Washington DC to be significantly higher than in health care. Question: When Barack Obama tried to gut the USA Patriot Act and other important laws that will promote safety and security for all Americans to defend the Republicans in Congress? "President Obama is obviously not capable of such acts, because the Congress, and make abrogated by the correlation laws. But he can try to take the members of his party in Congress for such action. But more to the point of this question is that Republicans, I stress once again attempts to use against any unconstitutional powers to the government. If the unconstitutional provisions of any law, including the USA Patriot Act, they should be combated. As such, I would not have carte BLACHE authority, simply keep something just because it is and explain it so well, without knowing exactly what features you want to talk about. Question: "Are we going to stop the democratic leaders from cutting support from our intelligence services, or take back the Clinton-era restrictions on inter-administrative communication?" I am convinced that the costs of all government programs, including our intelligence services have. Therefore argue against this reduction of funds would be inappropriate. If you ask me the question is whether Republicans will stand against the Democrats may try to neuter the intelligence and they are inefficient on available funds, without rhyme or reason, just for the money to other plans, they would then pay the answer is definitely yes. Have a question: "Is it possible to use air strikes against any country," safe harbor or aid to individuals or organizations who commit further attacks against America? "I think to defend America, a clearly defined role of the federal government is, therefore, that the answer is absolutely. But I would still go on to say that each country would take such a step for performing a de facto act of war against this country and should be increased by means other than the bombings of several thousand feet are treated in the sky. Question: "Should Republicans unite to support full funding for border and port security, when Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are trying to make cuts in their areas?" Are you honestly wonder if the Republicans should take seriously their pledges to preserve and defend the Constitution according to his election to public office? Of course you should. Q: Do you think U.S. troops would be under United Nations commanders to serve? "I think that this question generates another. If the U.S. is a member of the UN, an organization, tin horned dictators and grotesque gangster who can give our country and act as if they are legitimate statesmen? The answer to this question is not, and it also applies to the specific question of you, too. Question: Do you think that our top military priority should be fighting terrorists? "Our priority should be the military defense of the United States and its allies around the world. If at the time, the fight against terrorists, then yes, too. Question: Should we fight to reduce the overall military effort in Congress proposed by the liberal Barney Frank, the Pentagon spending by 25%? "The military and the defense of America is one of the few functions that the federal government to participate, in fact unconstitutional. This is not to say, but as with intelligence programs that I mentioned earlier that there is waste and abuse, which can not be eradicated. However, just Hack and slash funding in an effort, money for other government programs that do not find a constitutional or not is confirmed. Q: Despite the fact that Barack Obama has promised to personally help people who Raul Castro, Hugo Chavez and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, they should concentrate on the Republicans continue to support democratic movements in repressive countries such as Cuba, Venezuela and Iran? "It's not that we support the" democratic "movements as much as we ought to be measures of those who support either the search or to find true freedom. "Democratic" movement often leads to bad things in Germany before World War II, France, Venezuela, etc. It is the purpose of the movement, not the character of the movement itself, which ultimately must be considered. As such, the United States should go hand in hand with freedom-loving people back and support them as we can. If we do not dear the freedom for people in Africa because of its proximity, we must continue to announce our very failure to act, not by our own basic documents, that all men are created equal and are entitled to freedom. Q: Why have the Republicans lose the White House and Congress's mandate in the 2008 elections? "Since the Republicans as a whole, have failed to strictly adhere to our core values and they have not defended our Constitution. Instead, they have all, and all connect to its leadership ranks and stand as a candidate to run amok, even if they are not of the quality and caliber that will be delivered directly. If you like you're running against are looking for, give you no reason for people to vote for you on them with you on. Q: What are the strongest and beliefs of the Republican Party, can we build? "The rules of our founding documents and nothing more. But no less. But in recent memory, I have come to question whether they really are things that the Republican Party believe in Q: What are the shortcomings of the Republican Party? "Let me answer that question issues of my own for you. When was the last time was the Republican Party was violently against the welfare of the culture in the U.S., which made the slaves are productive, the lazy and those who believe they are entitled to something or someone else because of their age or life situation? When was the last time the Republican Party was attacked violently the falsity of the numerous unconstitutional spending programs gushing forth from Washington and she noticed more than lip service? I am my own and actually called it unconstitutional! Not only that, along important issue and has symptoms of high programs and unmanageable debt for our children, lost jobs, destruction of families and so on? When was the last time the Republicans had the courage to tackle a political party in the third railway package policy and take it with steady hands and are generally without concern that those who benefit from such programs are wrong says unconstitutional to try to keep their own hands in the cookie jar? answer these questions and you get the answer to your question. Q: What is the best way to promote and register new voters in your community is it? "I think the possibility of a personal appearance by the Republican leadership, vision and the importance of personal freedom and can express ourselves from bloated government sheds which are now strangling our children is best. But I think of the idea that there were few, if any, Republican leaders are capable of such a mission. Q: What technological innovations should address the RNC, the growth of our party? "It is no longer technological innovation, increase the Republican Party. Only a strong message of freedom and repeatedly show that the Republican Party believe in this message is to do it. Since the message is delivered is secondary and should not be the biggest concern in the party. To put the cart before the horse, just GOP fails to failure penalty. To correct the Philippine government has its own house and get the message right before it can grow the party. Q: What can the Republican Party to win your trust? "Unfortunately, this is no simple answer. The Republican party has so much to do, that confidence has not been easy. The party has betrayed the U.S. and our first principles are so many times that it will reach a huge task in itself just a point of modest confidence considerably less skilled work. A recurring theme is that many members of the party too liberal, and do too much damage to America with his actions after the election to the office. These people should not be members of the party while it is unsustainable, relationships with these people through fear of losing power and numbers in the current House and Senate, we see that they do not trust to tell anyway. See the ignoble Arlen Specter of my own State of Pennsylvania, to recognize that his political career may be over and that he hopes will not win the party primary, the party boat, he was more in line with the launch. Specter was never a chance of having given a run by the Republican Party, but in a lust for power, which he did easily on a bike after bike, because of his choice in a state that does not add regularly to all those liberal voting Democrats. Other members of the party, Senator John McCain, for example, has striking legislation within the chambers of Congress, directly against the constitution and introduced it tries to avoid. I am talking about the McCain-Feingold. There is absolutely no excuse for a man or a woman, GOP, even for one second that this is nothing less than an unconstitutional interference with the freedom that our God. But he and many others are not, in favor of the party stayed. And I do not think I still point out the ugliness of the TARP, as many members of the Republican Party and another supported clearly unconstitutional overreach. Far be it from me to suggest that there would be no disagreement among members of the party on issues. But if these issues are so clearly in violation of the Constitution is not yet supported by party members must be taken seriously, to see if they are worth more than the Republicans. If not, they should be thanked for their service and ran against either Democrat, Independent or third with another party, that their actions would accept. It has become clear that over the years, is the Republican Party well prepared, in principle, to remove from his trial, the selection of candidates in exchange for the possibility of increasing the candidate of the party's numbers and power in Washington, not only, but also state and local levels. The Republican party is required to correct this, confidence in Americans who still believe in freedom and the party be prepared to separate them, not to keep up with the fact our Constitution and the principles of limited government, most of the heart to win. The example most of it is clear that the Senate elections in 2004 by Mr. Arlen Specter. The Republican party ignored a much better candidate in terms of republican ideals, Pat Toomey, openly supporting the incumbent. And now he has repaid the efforts that I like? Think you my hand point. To be honest, Mr. Steele, I'm not so sure you really are the man who can help achieve the goal of regaining my confidence and trust of either many other Americans, the Philippine government so desperately needs. You have not earned my trust, and while I want to give you the opportunity to continue to do so I'm skeptical. I will not tell your character, just that I like when I was out and that some of you know, I am not enough to trust you enough and that the actions of the party and its members will be in the middle knows the future direction dictate place this important issue. I think this skepticism about the current state of the party has a place and understand the extremely poor candidates have been presented to us, seen as alternatives in the 2008 presidential election cycle alone. It was mostly an assortment of moderate and center-left candidate, whose stories constitutional violations were the excesses of big government, general madness and promotion of the failed socialist program known but often ignored. The party has a great history. But it has a dark future if these are the best guides we have found and continue. Earn my trust to millions of weeds from the lawn and maintain the growth of a company and dense grass that can all go hand in hand with no concern of thorns and other nuisances. Take advantage of this weed and threw them on the compost and allow them to rot, so they can fertilize the growing good. Q: Do you want to helping Republican National Committee to implement your ideas and help progress our party-building program for the elections in 2009-2010 with a contribution today? "While I was on top of what you are looking for monetary aid course for your efforts, you may consider this letter to you as my contribution. My time is precious and I am a decent wage per hour for my time as an officer, and this letter took the greater part of ten hours to compile into a state where I am comfortable with to make note, I think you should accept this as my contribution and not as you see fit to support your efforts. Laus Deo, Jeffrey J. (JJ) Jackson, President of Land of the Free Studios, Inc.

JJ Jackson is the owner of American Conservative Daily Blog. He is also the chief designer for the right things – Conservative Political T-shirts and his weeks of articles and exclusive content can be found at Liberty Reborn.

Share and Enjoy: